As the Global Refugee Crisis deepens, particularly the exodus from Syria to uncertain European shores, it is moving to see so many quarters at York University stepping up to respond. I have focused on Osgoode’s initiatives and York’s collaboration with WUSC to provide support for refugees studying at York in a previous post, but here I wish to look more broadly at the University’s efforts. York is a large, vibrant and young University, with a particular focus on social inclusion and social innovation.
As the heart-wrenching images from Europe continue to shape the refugee debate in Canada (how many refugees should Canada take? How can the time-consuming process be expedited? What are the legal and social implications of these efforts? How will the new Trudeau Government make good on its ambitious campaign pledges?), the place of Universities has come to the fore. Ryerson University partnered with the NGO Lifeline Syria to create the Lifeline Syria Challenge which facilitates private sponsorships through the University and has established a target of raising funds for 25 families (with a minimum threshold of $27,000 each), in addition to volunteer efforts to support resettlement of those families in Toronto for a first year after arrival. The GTA’s other Universities, including York, have joined forces to support this initiative, in addition to pursuing others to bring more resources to supporting refugees (York, for example, working with World University Students of Canada (WUSC), plans to expand the tuition waivers and financial supports for refugees coming to the University to study as discussed in today’s Y-File story).
This weekend, I participated in the Indigenous Bar Association’s annual Conference, this year themed around the pursuit of “Reconciliation” in the wake of the Indian Residential Schools’ Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Calls to Action. I was asked to share thoughts on what Reconciliation meant, both in the sphere of legal education and to me personally. The Conference was lively, thoughtful and hopeful and I hope its momentum continues to place Indigenous lawyers, law students, law reform activists and legal educators at the forefront of charting a way forward. Continue reading “The TRC Calls to Action & the pursuit of “Reconciliation””
I had the privilege to attend and speak at a landmark conference on Global Legal Education held at Tsinghua University’s Faculty of Law in Beijing this past weekend (though admittedly an unusual place to spend Canadian Thanksgiving). The conference helped celebrate the 20th anniversary of the re-establishment of Tsinghua’s Law School (now among China’s very best, and one of Osgoode’s newest global partners), and to mark a moment of significant reform in Chinese legal education, as well as disruption and change in many other jurisdictions. This led me to ask whether there is a distinctly Canadian approach to Global Legal Education? Continue reading “Global Legal Education at the Crossroads”
This Saturday, I was invited to speak at the annual Conference of the Federation of Asian Canadian Lawyers (FACL), this year with the theme “Paving the Way.” Each year I attend, the gathering gets bigger, livelier and represents a snapshot of the legal profession’s vibrant future. In addition to participating on an engaging panel exploring the end of the first full year of the Law Practice Program (LPP), I was asked to join the final plenary panel ambitiously titled “60 tips in 60 minutes”! Six lawyers were asked each to offer 10 tips on how to serve clients better, manage practices more efficiently, develop business relationships, increase profile in an increasingly diverse profession, and ensure ethical compliance. I was joined by Ian Hu of LawPro; Phillip Tsui of MAG; Law Society Bencher Jeffrey Lem; Bindu Cudjoe, the Deputy General Counsel of BMO; and Lai-King Hum, National President of FACL and owner of her own firm. I understand the tips from the whole panel will be posted shortly on the FACL site and I found the tips from others invaluable, but in the meantime, in hopes these may be of interest to some who were not in the room, below are my ten tips on enriching personal and professional success for young lawyers. Continue reading “A Day with “FACL” & 10 Tips for New Lawyers”
[this post was initially published on Slaw on September 22, 2015 as part of a blog series with the Canadian Council of Law Deans]
I am pleased to participate in this regular series of posts from the Council of Canadian Law Deans (CCLD) sharing insights and ideas on Canadian legal education. This past summer, I explored the impact of design principles on the justice system and since then, I have been reflecting more on the impact of design principles on Law Schools.
Has our legal education system developed as a series of ad hoc measures, policies and programs or has it been designed according to a plan? This question is being asked more broadly in Law Schools as legal academics and lawyers bring design principles to the question of where and how people access legal education, where and how people learn about law, and where and how people solve the problems that matter most in their lives. Whether the new Calgary Curriculum, the Integrated Practice Curriculum at Lakehead or McGill’s Transsystemic Legal Education, more Law Schools are differentiating their programs by design. Continue reading “Law School by Design”
[a version of this post was published by the Globe and Mail on August 10, 2015] Can the Federal and Provincial governments work together on policy matters on which they disagree? The answer in Canada is simple – they can and they must. This issue has come to a head around the Ontario’s Retirement Pension Plan (ORPP) proposal, which the Provincial Government has developed because it believes the Canada Pension Plan is inadequate, and which the Federal Government has stated it will not help administer through its existing Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) infrastructure . The Ontario Retirement Pension Plan will be phased in over two years and will be offered at companies without employee pension plans. Self-employed Ontarians also may be able to opt-in. Companies with sufficient retirement plans will be exempt, and the lowest-income earners will not be required to contribute. While the ORPP could be run entirely by Ontario, this would increase the cost and could decrease the effectiveness of the scheme. The sniping of the Federal and Ontario Governments on this issue began shortly after its announcement, and will no doubt continue to intensify over the course of this unusually long Federal election campaign. Continue reading “Federalism, Pensions and the limits of Partisanship in Canada”
In July, York’s President Mamdouh Shoukri announced that he had appointed me as his advisor on community engagement and the Chair of the Community Engagement Advisory Panel at York. I am very much looking forward to this new role at York. Below, I explore some of the reasons why. Continue reading “Community Engagement at York”
Earlier this month, I was elected as Chair of the Board of Directors of Reena. Reena is a remarkable developmental service agency, and aspires to live its commitment to treat all individuals as equally deserving of dignity and opportunity. I wanted to share why I am so passionate about Reena and its mission – and why values matter. Continue reading “Reena – and why values matter!”
Has our justice system developed as a series of ad hoc measures, policies and programs or has it been designed according to a planned vision? This question is being asked more broadly in Law Schools as legal academics and lawyers bring design principles to the question of where and how people access justice. It is a question which may lead to suprising, disruptive and absolutely necessary answers. Continue reading “Justice by Design”